October. Acrylic on paper
http://www.andrew-dalton.com/
While there, chatting to Sarah, I was surprised and delighted to learn that I had sold a drawing! It is one of my small studies that I left with the gallery after the three woman show last year. This news was a real boost; it will cover the cost of the cards I've just ordered to sell alongside the prints of my work at the show.
The last few weeks have been extremely stressful; frantic activity on the anti fracking campaign as we near the deadline for objecting to the application by Third Energy and trying meanwhile to prepare for a presentation for something I have been shortlisted for and nearly caving in with exhaustion and frustration with all the work.
However, on Thursday I delivered my presentation. Not well, but I did it. I suppose I can only hope that my passion and excitement about delivering my ideas and the opportunity to grow creatively that the placement would give me shone through. I am not sure when I will hear if I have been successful or not; competition was fierce and the applications, we were told, were of an exceptionally high caliber. Fingers crossed then. . . .
The day after making my presentation, I attended another seminar. this time organised by Chrysalis Arts entitled Contemporary Artists in Rural Contexts. It was a great opportunity to catch up with some of my favourite people and I met a few more rather lovely ones too. The first half was pretty good although one of the speakers was rather unprofessional in the way he criticised the project of two artists and as good as named them by showing their work, which I felt was rather spiteful and unnecessary. All the other presenters were very interesting.
The "discussion" session, however, was dire. I felt frustrated by the lack of any real discussion because it was all led from the front with questions from the audience, not all of which could be heard. It was very old school and it felt very much as if we were being told what the answers were, almost as if there was only one answer. Sadly it all felt a bit preconceived to my mind. It would have been so much more constructive if we had divided into groups and discussed certain topics relating to artists in a rural context and then fed back to the whole group. There would, I think, have been a much richer exploration and sharing of ideas and we would all have learned something new as well as having the opportunity to get to know other people in the room a bit better.
I wonder, what the outcome of this day will be? There was certainly no mention of any follow up of the day or intention to study the issues in any more depth to produce a published analysis as far as I can recall. It was all very unsatisfactory, especially after my fantastic experience at the half day seminar/discussion with people in Wakefield organised by Axisweb recently.
Never mind, I have an exhibition to sort out now and there is no use dwelling on these things. And I have sold a drawing, did I say? Hah!
I should also add that Ruth Miemczyk's work that I went to see (and hear her in conversation with curator Lara Goodband) last week is stunning; utterly wonderful work. See previous blog entry for details.
Study. Acrylic on paper
All rights reserved
